FACT SHEET

January 20, 2011


Global Antitrust (Competition)

The laws that set the ground rules prohibiting firms from engaging in anti-competitive practices are usually called “antitrust laws” in the United States, and “competition laws” in Europe and other regions. Today, most nations, like the United States, have their own competition laws. These laws differ among nations, and each country enforces its laws independently. This lack of coordination leads to inefficiencies and confusion. In response to this, some observers argue that uniform global competition law should be adopted by international agreement. Enforcement would be handled by international organizations or coordinated among different nations.

Overview

These issues arise in discussions of global antitrust:
  • Problems for multinational firms caused by differences between competition law in different countries, such as business practices that are illegal in one region and not elsewhere, or the potential for prosecution by many nations for one set of actions.

  • The possibility that individual nations use competition law to give advantages to domestic firms or consumers, at the expense of foreign firms or consumers.

  • The approaches used by national and international organizations, such as the United States government and the World Trade Organization, to handle competition problems across borders.

  • The design and implementation of new global competition rules and the institutions that would enforce these international laws.

  • Concerns that international enforcement organizations would be ineffective or susceptible to political manipulation.
TAP Academics researching global antitrust issues include:
Anu Bradford of the University of Chicago Law School studies global competition policy and the design of international organizations.

“We are entering a new era in terms of having an increasing number of major players [in antitrust enforcement]... Just as we started to see more convergence [between the law in the U.S. and the E.U.] we had a new major player, China… and more than 100 countries that have antitrust laws of some kind.” FromInterview with Anu Bradford on International Competition and Antitrust Laws,” by TAP Staff, March 30, 2010
 
Daniel Sokol of the University of Florida Levin College of Law writes about global and international competition law issues and serves on the editorial board of the Competition Policy Institute’s Antitrust Chronicle (formerly Global Competition Policy Magazine).

Jay Pil Choi of Michigan State has written on international enforcement coordination.

Michael Whinston of Northwestern University and Ilya Segal of Stanford have written a comparison between U.S. and E.U. private antitrust lawsuits in “Public vs. Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law: A Survey.”

These sources are a good place to start in understanding global antitrust issues. Anu Bradford’s paper “Assessing Theories of Global Governance: A Case Study of International Antitrust Regulation” looks at how nations could cooperate in making competition policy. Her paper “International Antitrust Negotiations and the False Hope of the WTO” examines efforts by the World Trade Organization to get nations to agree on international antitrust policy. Abbott B. Lipsky writes about how firms manage global competition issues in “Managing Antitrust Compliance through the Continuing Surge in Global Enforcement.” Daniel Sokol’s paper “Monopolists Without Borders: The Institutional Challenge of International Antitrust in a Global Gilded Age” surveys international competition law enforcement. Ronald Cass’s op-ed,“The EU's 'Nationalization by Regulation',” critiques the European approach to antitrust.
Recent Developments
The International Competition Policy Advisory Committee (ICPAC) was formed in 1997 at the U.S. Department of Justice to address the lack of coordination in global antitrust, and issued a report before being disbanded in 2000. India established new competition law and enforcement institutions in 2002. China adopted its own competition law in 2007. The Courts and Competition Policy Subcommittee of the U.S. House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on the “Impact of China’s Antitrust Law and other Competition Policies on U.S. Companies” on July 13, 2010.
Upcoming Events
To view a calendar of events of relevance to TAP academic work, please see the TAP Events page.

Media Contact

For media inquiries on a range of TAP topics, or for assistance facilitating interviews between reporters and academics, contact TAP@techpolicy.com.

Key Legislation

(none at this time)

PDF Download

Share